dkuroda

Thanks Amy, that helps! I didn't know that OR was simply pipe symbols. I'm not familiar with Ruby and past attempts to try ruby formatting failed. Now I can do what RussellJ said and try stuff in dev.

I have nothing to try, since I don't know how to do blind ORs in the trigger form. If there is no way to do it, just tell me, as I've already spent time reading and looking for examples before I asked. Again, the question is one of efficiency, speed, and readability of code --> Can I do the 2 simple ANDs and (C or D or E) in one step? I have to pose the question this way since I've asked other folks and they suggest 3 ORs which misses the 3 ANDs, where the last AND is the 3 ORs. Inquiring minds want to know.

Looks like formulas in the data fields is the way to do this. Continuing this for clarity, my use case is more A and B and (C or D or E), which would ABC or ABD or ABE, but it would seem much faster to combine 2 simple ANDs and (C or D or E) in one step vs, three long AND formulas. Can I do the 2 simple ANDs and (C or D or E) in one step? or rather what would the data field look like to combine the C or D or E into one datafield formula so I can use the three AND version? Thanks again for your help.

Thanks. My google searches came up with a bunch of systematic links and didn't even show the workato page in results on the 1st page. The google AI answer suggested the sys_script ACL, and I got it partially working using just "create". Seeing the other 3 ACLs (4 in total) make sense, but that might be a challenge to get the customer to agree to that. I'll give it a shot, but but if anyone has ideas on how to convey "least privilege" with ACLs that write business rules I could use your suggestions.