Guide Request for Implementing MCP App on Workato Agentic Platform

Shivam · 2026-08-20T16:00:08.266Z

I am seeking guide on MCP app of Workato agentic platform. Anyone implemented app using it?

Workato Builders Community

Guide Request for Implementing MCP App on Workato Agentic Platform | Workato Builders Community

9 comments

· Sorted by Oldest

Aaron W.
·
·
Chris M. - do you have a recommended guide? Shivam - www.workato.com/developers might be a great place to start.
👍1
richy.mulcahy
·
·
Shivam are you talking about this feature? docs.workato.com/en/mcp/mcp-apps
Chris M.
·
·
Aaron W. We are working on some content for this, but I don't have an ETA. The official docs is the right place to start.
👍1
Shivam
·
·
richy.mulcahy, yes, that's the one.
Shivam
·
(edited)·
We use artifact to show AI generated email content however from my reading by far this MCP app could be a good candidate to use instead of on-request artifact.
richy.mulcahy
·
·
from my understanding this is the high level differences MCP apps live inside the tool itself so any AI client can render them (Claude, ChatGPT, etc), and once launched the app calls other tools directly without going back to the AI. Great for reviewing/approving data that already exists. also part of the protocol so not tied to a vendor. Artifacts stay in conversation with the AI the whole time, so they're the better fit when you want to keep revising content back and forth. but i believe tied to claude. Quick question for you, once you see an email draft, are you usually asking the AI to tweak or rewrite it, or mostly just reviewing and sending as is? if your looking to keep conversing with the LLM then and atifact is likely better. if its more review, make a change, and then approve/reject MCP app is great. The MCP app will also likely have lower token costs since its not involving the model every step
Shivam
·
·
Yes, the artifact now shows a preview on the left and basic edit-text fields on the right. Because the MCP app can leverage Tailwind, the edit-text fields can be more feature-rich — meaning users might not need AI to make minor edits. This will save tokens and time. Once edits are done, basic approval seems to be supported by the MCP app. Am I drafting the idea correctly?
Shivam
·
·
The email preview already has content generated by our copywriter agent so user generally make minor changes to it.
richy.mulcahy
·
·
yea as long as you dont need cycles with the LLM MCP app should work.

Aaron W.
·
·
Chris M. - do you have a recommended guide? Shivam - www.workato.com/developers might be a great place to start.
👍1
richy.mulcahy
·
·
Shivam are you talking about this feature? docs.workato.com/en/mcp/mcp-apps
Chris M.
·
·
Aaron W. We are working on some content for this, but I don't have an ETA. The official docs is the right place to start.
👍1
Shivam
·
·
richy.mulcahy, yes, that's the one.
Shivam
·
(edited)·
We use artifact to show AI generated email content however from my reading by far this MCP app could be a good candidate to use instead of on-request artifact.
richy.mulcahy
·
·
from my understanding this is the high level differences MCP apps live inside the tool itself so any AI client can render them (Claude, ChatGPT, etc), and once launched the app calls other tools directly without going back to the AI. Great for reviewing/approving data that already exists. also part of the protocol so not tied to a vendor. Artifacts stay in conversation with the AI the whole time, so they're the better fit when you want to keep revising content back and forth. but i believe tied to claude. Quick question for you, once you see an email draft, are you usually asking the AI to tweak or rewrite it, or mostly just reviewing and sending as is? if your looking to keep conversing with the LLM then and atifact is likely better. if its more review, make a change, and then approve/reject MCP app is great. The MCP app will also likely have lower token costs since its not involving the model every step
Shivam
·
·
Yes, the artifact now shows a preview on the left and basic edit-text fields on the right. Because the MCP app can leverage Tailwind, the edit-text fields can be more feature-rich — meaning users might not need AI to make minor edits. This will save tokens and time. Once edits are done, basic approval seems to be supported by the MCP app. Am I drafting the idea correctly?
Shivam
·
·
The email preview already has content generated by our copywriter agent so user generally make minor changes to it.
richy.mulcahy
·
·
yea as long as you dont need cycles with the LLM MCP app should work.